<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Riesling Rules Book &#187; Wine industry data monster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/category/our-wine-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Quick harvest report</title>
		<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/harvest/quick-harvest-report/</link>
		<comments>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/harvest/quick-harvest-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Que Paso during harvest?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scoop on Pacific Rim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine industry data monster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/?p=1070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a summary of our long and painful 2011 harvest:
OREGON:
We brought some Riesling from Oregon but also some Pinot Noir and Pinot Gris for our new Oregon winery project. It was a challenging harvest in OR overall following an unseasonably cool spring and summer (Thank you la Nina). We thought that all would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a summary of our long and painful 2011 harvest:</p>
<p>OREGON:</p>
<p>We brought some Riesling from Oregon but also some Pinot Noir and Pinot Gris for our new Oregon winery project. It was a challenging harvest in OR overall following an unseasonably cool spring and summer (Thank you la Nina). We thought that all would be saved by a great August and a promising September but the weather turned cold mid-September slowing down ripening considerably. We were aggressive with yield reduction to allow what was left to ripen a bit more. The saving grace has been the dry weather which has reduced fungal pressure in OR tremendously. We saw little or no rot on any varietal. Most folks started to harvest mid-October wrapping harvest in 2 to 3 weeks – bit of a flash harvest ahead of the rain that are in the forecast as far as the eye can see now. Overall the fruit is low in sugar (21 Brix) but fruit flavors are ripe with no greenness, and colors on the Pinot Noir are very decent indeed. I think that overall it will be a nice vintage with delicate flavors that will reward wineries that tend to go for elegance against power. The Riesling was low Brix and is slotted for a Kabinett style.</p>
<p>WASHINGTON:</p>
<p>Same pattern than OR in WA minus the rain factor and plus frost issues. The summer was very cool and 2011 will be remembered as one of the coldest vintage on record, cooler than 2010 even &#8211; 2011 is the 8th coldest year on record sandwiched between 1976 and 1970. The yields were quite lower than last year due to some winter frost damage and some aggressive thinning after bloom. WA harvest as a whole will probably be 20% below average yield which has probably helped to get most fruit to good ripeness. Acids are high and everyone brought some nice botrytis with the fruit. Overall it is a little riper of a vintage (bit weird but the acids were much lower than 2010) for us and we will be able to make every Riesling style we usually produce. We are leaving a few acres out to see if this is a good ice wine year, we might get something good out of this cold weather!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/harvest/quick-harvest-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Projected Washington State grape harvest 2011</title>
		<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/projected-washington-state-grape-harvest-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/projected-washington-state-grape-harvest-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 19:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[It's the grapes, stupid!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine industry data monster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/?p=1055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we are entering the final stretch of the grape growing season, the growers and wineries of Washington State have published their projected harvest numbers. Below are the top key points:

Total estimated crop is 20% below last year due to a freeze kill this winter – 128K tons vs 160K tons in 2010 – this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we are entering the final stretch of the grape growing season, the growers and wineries of Washington State have published their projected harvest numbers. Below are the top key points:</p>
<ul>
<li>Total estimated crop is 20% below last year due to a freeze kill this winter – 128K tons vs 160K tons in 2010 – this is the equivalent of 1.8M cases</li>
<li>Red are more affected than whites – reds down 26%, whites down 8%</li>
<li>Among reds, major loser is Cabernet Sauvignon (-39%) and all major red varietals are down</li>
<li>Among whites, major loser is Chardonnay (-17%) and somewhat Riesling (-13%). Pinot Gris is actually projected a good 20% above 2010 due to speculative planting putting pressure on Pinot Gris prices</li>
<li>Looking at the future, 2012 could be as high as 176K tons, 10% higher than 2010 – so there is no long term shortage</li>
</ul>
<p>Overall this is a pretty decent projection. We should not see any major shortage except Cabernet Sauvignon. If the weather stays above 90F until mid-September we could actually have a stellar vintage with low crop and mild temperatures -&gt; Perfect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/projected-washington-state-grape-harvest-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon footprint</title>
		<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/carbon-footprint/</link>
		<comments>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/carbon-footprint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Are U green enough?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine industry data monster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/?p=1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been looking lately at the environmental impact of screwcaps closure and I came accross an interesting survey from a company called &#8220;Quantis&#8221; related to the carbon footprint of the wine supply chain. I think the study was sponsored by the European Aluminum producer, so not fully removed from the industry but Quantis is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been looking lately at the environmental impact of screwcaps closure and I came accross an interesting survey from a company called &#8220;Quantis&#8221; related to the carbon footprint of the wine supply chain. I think the study was sponsored by the European Aluminum producer, so not fully removed from the industry but Quantis is a serious third party with good credentials: <a href="http://www.quantis-intl.com/">http://www.quantis-intl.com/</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/CO2-footprint1.bmp"><img class="size-full wp-image-1015  aligncenter" title="CO2 footprint" src="http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/CO2-footprint1.bmp" alt="" width="353" height="288" /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Above is the chart that sort out the different sources of carbon emission during the supply chain &#8211; from the vineyard to the consumer&#8217;s table. Several very interesting points:</p>
<p>1) The winery impact is really small, may 9% of total carbon emmission. So solar panels, water reduction program and other winery improvements are nice but really they don&#8217;t move the needle much &#8211; though at Pacific Rim we have very good water, waste and electrical conservancy program</p>
<p>2) Glass is about 40% of the total carbon emission &#8211; holy molly, that is a lot. Please note that Pacific Rim is using 95% EcoSerie glass, the lightest glass available in the USA (made in USA &#8211; 393 g/bottle). We also don&#8217;t use pallets for our case goods (they are heavy, they take room, they have a carbon footprint from manufacturing, etc..)</p>
<p>3) Stopper is really not a big deal as far as carbon emission is concerned &#8211; Retail transportation (ie from the winery to the retailer) is more important than closure &#8211; again light weight glass would help here</p>
<p>4) The other big carbon emiter is the consumer driving to the store, picking up the wine, using the wine etc&#8230; &#8211; about 25% of the carbon footprint.  We should buy 12 bottles at a time to make things more efficient!</p>
<p>Will report on my screwcap findings next week</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/carbon-footprint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cold cold &#8211; where are the warm days?</title>
		<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/cold-cold-where-are-the-warm-days/</link>
		<comments>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/cold-cold-where-are-the-warm-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 20:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[It's the grapes, stupid!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine industry data monster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/?p=1009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick update on the growing season (or lack of growing season one might say). The cold weather on the West coast is affecting the Columbia Valley and right now the vine growth is pretty anemic. Check out the growing degree day chart below:

2011 is not even off the ground &#8211; 10 degree days total &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick update on the growing season (or lack of growing season one might say). The cold weather on the West coast is affecting the Columbia Valley and right now the vine growth is pretty anemic. Check out the growing degree day chart below:</p>
<p><img src="http://wine.wsu.edu/research-extension/files/gdd/11gdd.GIF" alt="2010 Growing Season GDD" width="456" height="356" /></p>
<p>2011 is not even off the ground &#8211; 10 degree days total &#8211; ouch. We need to see the temperature kick off a bit soon &#8211; please? Added to our temperature worries, many vineyards were hit by frost this winter and some vineyards were nailed pretty badly (none of ours apparently -there is a watchful angel for Riesling producers). The combo of winter damage and aa anemic growing season right now will make for a rocky vintage &#8211; we can still catch up of course if finally the weather starts cooperating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/cold-cold-where-are-the-warm-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>latest NASS stats: Riesling #1 wine grape harvested in WA in 2010</title>
		<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/latest-nass-stats-riesling-1-wine-grape-harvested-in-wa-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/latest-nass-stats-riesling-1-wine-grape-harvested-in-wa-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 05:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine industry data monster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Lastest National Agricultural Statistics Service grape data for the mighty State of Washington are in and Riesling was the number one varietal harvested in total tons in 2010. An incredible performance considering that I suspect the total Riesling tonnage was down due to a heavy Botrytis pressure.  Here is the list:
#1: Riesling: 33.5K tons +4.4% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img id="il_fi" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GoBxXeCqQsc/SurmEJDHPuI/AAAAAAAACXs/TRtpNedY62Q/s400/man-climbing-paperwork1.jpg" alt="" width="259" height="300" /></p>
<p>Lastest National Agricultural Statistics Service grape data for the mighty State of Washington are in and Riesling was the number one varietal harvested in total tons in 2010. An incredible performance considering that I suspect the total Riesling tonnage was down due to a heavy Botrytis pressure.  Here is the list:</p>
<p>#1: Riesling: 33.5K tons +4.4% vs 2009, prices slightly up vs 2009</p>
<p>#2: Cabernet Sauvignon: 31.9K tons, +15.6%, prices slightly up</p>
<p>#3: Chardonnay: 28.6K tons, -14.4%, prices slightly up</p>
<p>#4: Merlot: 28.3K tons, +14.1%, prices slightly up</p>
<p>#5: Syrah: 10.9K tons, +9%, prices slightly up</p>
<p>Overall the State is estimated to have harvested 160,000 tons or about 10.4 Million cases. Riesling alone was probably about 2.2 million cases. Below is an estimate of where it went:</p>
<p>- Chateau St Michelle and friends (Snoqualmie, Columbia Crest, Eroica program): 1.1 Million</p>
<p>- Hogue: 0.25M</p>
<p>- Pacific Rim: 0.16M (that one I know for sure)</p>
<p>- Ascentia (Covey Run+Columbia): 0.14M</p>
<p>- all others: 0.55M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/latest-nass-stats-riesling-1-wine-grape-harvested-in-wa-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retail sale data well sliced and explained</title>
		<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/retail-sale-data-well-sliced-and-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/retail-sale-data-well-sliced-and-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Book</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine industry data monster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/?p=994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would not have said it better than the wine economist at: http://wineeconomist.com/2010/11/30/retail-wine-sales-big-versus-hot-hot-hot/
A good quick read that would once again show our dear Riesling performing very well.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would not have said it better than the wine economist at: <a href="http://wineeconomist.com/2010/11/30/retail-wine-sales-big-versus-hot-hot-hot/">http://wineeconomist.com/2010/11/30/retail-wine-sales-big-versus-hot-hot-hot/</a></p>
<p>A good quick read that would once again show our dear Riesling performing very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/retail-sale-data-well-sliced-and-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s almost over</title>
		<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/harvest/its-almost-over/</link>
		<comments>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/harvest/its-almost-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Que Paso during harvest?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scoop on Pacific Rim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine industry data monster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All good things have to come to an end, so celebrate the end this long and challenging harvest. We are in the final stretch and will be picking the Biodynamic Wallula vineyard this week and next and will be closing our doors around the 20th of November &#8211; the latest harvest in recent history. The preliminary results are showing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good things have to come to an end, so celebrate the end this long and challenging harvest. We are in the final stretch and will be picking the Biodynamic Wallula vineyard this week and next and will be closing our doors around the 20th of November &#8211; the latest harvest in recent history. The preliminary results are showing high acid wines, nice botrytis tone and low yields overall. The high acids will push us to produce sweeter styles this year to balance out the extra acids. The botrytis that we usually desperately look for in normal vintages has overwhelmed us in 2010 &#8211; the wines should reflect a more waxy, honey like character this vintage. Lower yields will guarantee a short supply of WA Riesling this year, it will be interesting to see how the market receives a very Germanic vintage from Washington &#8211; me like it despite the added stress, you?</p>
<p>The results from the GDD race are in, 2003 will end at 2325 which will put it in on par with 1974 and 1970 &#8211; 2003 is now the 9th coolest year in WA on record (<a title="Click here for GDD ranking" href="http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/2010/09/20/">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/2010/09/20/</a>). The final GDD chart for the year is below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://wine.wsu.edu/research-extension/files/gdd/10gdd.gif" alt="2010 Growing Season GDD" width="432" height="358" /></p>
<p>As I have hinted before, we will probably not make a dry Riesling this year except for our Wallula Biodynamic and Solstice Rieslings single vineyards (they will probably be close to 1% RS so not fully &#8220;trocken&#8221;). As far as cool and new wines we are exploring, we are still trying to make a decent TBA, very scary wine to make, the jury is still out on this one so stay tune. Another experiment this year is a 100% carbonic maceration Gamay &#8211; that is also a bit of a work in progress right now.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s check in in two weeks when all the grapes are in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/harvest/its-almost-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 one of the coolest year on record for Washington?</title>
		<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/harvest/2010-one-of-the-coolest-year-on-record-for-washington/</link>
		<comments>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/harvest/2010-one-of-the-coolest-year-on-record-for-washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[It's the grapes, stupid!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Que Paso during harvest?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine industry data monster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/?p=976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick post to show you the last 41 years of cumulative GDD data (Yakima Valley) that I got today:







Year 
Cum GDD (ºF)


1984
            2,232


1971
            2,240


1975
            2,240


1999
            2,244


1980
            2,247


1983
            2,271


1976
            2,272


1970
            2,324


1974
            2,326


1978
            2,352


1981
            2,354


1993
            2,367


1996
            2,368


1982
            2,370


1973
            2,406


2008
            2,418


1972
            2,442


1995
            2,475


2007
            2,488


2000
            2,492


2002
            2,526


1977
            2,551


1989
            2,560


1997
            2,568


2001
            2,619


1986
            2,632


1991
            2,645


1985
            2,653


2005
            2,653


2006
            2,660


2009
            2,663


1979
            2,739


1988
            2,751


2004
            2,778


1994
            [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick post to show you the last 41 years of cumulative GDD data (Yakima Valley) that I got today:</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="154">
<colgroup span="1">
<col span="1" width="64"></col>
<col span="1" width="90"></col>
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr height="17">
<td width="64" height="17">Year </td>
<td width="90">Cum GDD (ºF)</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1984</td>
<td>            2,232</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1971</td>
<td>            2,240</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1975</td>
<td>            2,240</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1999</td>
<td>            2,244</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1980</td>
<td>            2,247</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1983</td>
<td>            2,271</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1976</td>
<td>            2,272</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1970</td>
<td>            2,324</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1974</td>
<td>            2,326</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1978</td>
<td>            2,352</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1981</td>
<td>            2,354</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1993</td>
<td>            2,367</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1996</td>
<td>            2,368</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1982</td>
<td>            2,370</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1973</td>
<td>            2,406</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">2008</td>
<td>            2,418</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1972</td>
<td>            2,442</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1995</td>
<td>            2,475</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">2007</td>
<td>            2,488</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">2000</td>
<td>            2,492</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">2002</td>
<td>            2,526</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1977</td>
<td>            2,551</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1989</td>
<td>            2,560</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1997</td>
<td>            2,568</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">2001</td>
<td>            2,619</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1986</td>
<td>            2,632</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1991</td>
<td>            2,645</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1985</td>
<td>            2,653</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">2005</td>
<td>            2,653</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">2006</td>
<td>            2,660</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">2009</td>
<td>            2,663</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1979</td>
<td>            2,739</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1988</td>
<td>            2,751</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">2004</td>
<td>            2,778</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1994</td>
<td>            2,806</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1998</td>
<td>            2,877</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1990</td>
<td>            2,884</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1992</td>
<td>            2,900</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">2003</td>
<td>            2,910</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17" align="right">1987</td>
<td>            2,979</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> Exciting table, no? The warmest years were 1987, 2003, 1992, 1990 and 1998. The coolest were 1984, 1971, 1975, 1999 and 1980. Right now we are trailing slightly behind 1999 so we could have the coldest year on record. What does that mean for quality? Well, it will really depends of night time temperature I believe. If we can hang our fruit without a night time frost for another 5 to 6 weeks, we will have a great vintage like 1999. If not, we will have a repeat of 1984 which, I have heard, was a disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/harvest/2010-one-of-the-coolest-year-on-record-for-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s set the record straight on Washington and Riesling</title>
		<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/lets-set-the-record-straight-on-washington-and-riesling/</link>
		<comments>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/lets-set-the-record-straight-on-washington-and-riesling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine industry data monster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Las week I came across a grocery store wine sales report that outlined the main varietals and the main wine regions sold in US grocery stores (note the data does not include sales from restaurants and other non grocery stores). The grocery store data is very indicative of what is going on in the market [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Las week I came across a grocery store wine sales report that outlined the main varietals and the main wine regions sold in US grocery stores (note the data does not include sales from restaurants and other non grocery stores). The grocery store data is very indicative of what is going on in the market place but not all perfect (big disclaimer). Nevertheless, let me tell you that Washington and Riesling are looking pretty good (we like that at Pacific Rim) &#8211; the data is for the past 52 weeks total dollars sold:</p>
<p>Main Wine Regions:</p>
<p>- Big #1: California: $3,000M</p>
<p>- Next three: Australia: $429M, Italy: $305M, <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Washington: $257M</span></strong></p>
<p>- Next Six: Chile: $87M, France: $85M, Argentina: $55M, Germany: $55M, New Zealand: $52M, Spain $42M</p>
<p>I know this is only grocery, but look at WA, not bad at all in this channel no?</p>
<p>Main Varietals:</p>
<p>- Big #1: Chardonnay: $942M</p>
<p>- Next three: Cabernet: $558M, Merlot: $423M, Pinot Gris/Grigio: $332M</p>
<p>- Next Six: Pinot Noir: $252M, Sauvignon Blanc: $195M, White Zinfandel: $229M, Riesling: $136M, Syrah: $136M, Zinfandel: $118</p>
<p>Well, looks like Riesling is about to -or will soon-  pass Syrah. Next &#8220;varietal&#8221; to beat is White Zinfandel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/lets-set-the-record-straight-on-washington-and-riesling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First look at crop size</title>
		<link>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/first-look-at-crop-size/</link>
		<comments>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/first-look-at-crop-size/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[It's the grapes, stupid!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine industry data monster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/?p=950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now is the time to look at yields and estimate the size of the harvest. We are practically done estimating at Pacific Rim and we think we will have a normal yield with some vineyards affected with some shatter (shatter = less berries per cluster due to bad fruit set). All in all we are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now is the time to look at yields and estimate the size of the harvest. We are practically done estimating at Pacific Rim and we think we will have a normal yield with some vineyards affected with some shatter (shatter = less berries per cluster due to bad fruit set). All in all we are happy with the size of harvest and the cooler weather which will probably delay harvest 8 to 12 days.</p>
<p>I have also received today a crop estimation from the Washington Association of Grape Grower (hence the post) and it confirms the delay in ripening due to cool weather. The current estimate for total crop for Washington is 156,000 tons (10 million cases) which would be flat to slightly up vs actual 2009 harvest. Chardonnay would still be #1, Riesling #2, Merlot #3 and Cabernet #4. All top four varietal would be slightly down except Merlot (be ready for some cheap Merlot out there!). Major growth in volume is projected to come from Sauvignon Blanc, Syrah (Syrah is struggling in the market place, so expect bit of oversupply) and Cabernet franc (what in heaven is going on with Cab Franc +1,500 tons?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rieslingrules.com/the_book/our-wine-industry/first-look-at-crop-size/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

